Service line 05

Who can your team afford to lose?

For Group Heads whose central team is small, senior, and one resignation away from trouble.

5

Line 5 of 5

The problem, in your words

3 to 15 people carrying an estate many times their size: one who holds the regulator relationship, one who understands the data, and one who's retiring next year, with the succession conversation kicked into the long grass again.

And now a new kind of team member: the AI tools doing part of the work. What are they allowed to do? Who checked, and who re-checks?

What the work looks like

A bounded review of your competency framework and your team against it, on 4 domains: technical EHS, business, behavioural, and digital, data and AI. Levels are set by evidence, never by self-assessment alone; every rating carries its grade, from demonstrated through to not evidenced.

Then the resilience questions: coverage against your risk profile, succession, single points of failure. Then development pathways, vertical and horizontal, so the map becomes a plan.

The AI actor register extends the same discipline to the non-human workers: bounded scope, evidence of performance, named oversight, revalidation.

Deliverables: a competency framework designed or critiqued; an evidence-graded team map; coverage, succession and resilience findings; development pathways; the AI actor register.

Boundaries

Simple Foundry doesn't sell coaching, paid one-to-one mentoring, psychometrics or recruitment. This is a review of structure and evidence rather than a talent product.

Pricing

Fixed fees by team size, agreed before work starts; scoped in a conversation rather than a rate card.